Deviation vs Nonconformance (NCR): Pick the Right Path
Introduction
Calling everything a “deviation” or everything an “NCR” leads to noise, rework, and audit risk. Here’s how to choose the right path quickly and defensibly.
Definitions
- Deviation: A departure from an approved process or instruction (the method wasn’t followed).
- Nonconformance (NCR): A product/result that fails to meet a specified requirement.
Decision tree
- Process not followed? → Deviation
- Result out of spec? → Nonconformance (link to deviation/CAPA if process failure caused it)
Examples
- Skipped in‑process check → Deviation; investigate why the step was missed.
- Batch fails assay spec → NCR; investigate cause; consider CAPA if systemic.
Documentation essentials
- Clear description and scope
- Impact and immediate containment
- Investigation summary
- Disposition/next steps
- Links to related CAPA/change/training
Typical pitfalls
- Treating NCRs as deviations to avoid disposition
- Raising CAPA for every deviation
Metrics
- Rate of deviations by process/equipment
- NCR rate by product/lot
- % linked to CAPA or change control
How an eQMS helps
- Distinct templates and required fields by record type
- Routing and approvals by role
- AI Assist: condenses narrative into a reviewer‑friendly summary and suggests checklists based on context
Conclusion
Use deviation for process departures, NCR for out‑of‑spec results, and connect them via CAPA/change when systemic. The clarity keeps audits calm and throughput high.