Miniature caution cone on a computer keyboard symbolizing data security and control.

Deviation vs Nonconformance (NCR): Pick the Right Path

Introduction

Calling everything a “deviation” or everything an “NCR” leads to noise, rework, and audit risk. Here’s how to choose the right path quickly and defensibly.

Definitions

  • Deviation: A departure from an approved process or instruction (the method wasn’t followed).
  • Nonconformance (NCR): A product/result that fails to meet a specified requirement.

Decision tree

  • Process not followed? → Deviation
  • Result out of spec? → Nonconformance (link to deviation/CAPA if process failure caused it)

Examples

  • Skipped in‑process check → Deviation; investigate why the step was missed.
  • Batch fails assay spec → NCR; investigate cause; consider CAPA if systemic.

Documentation essentials

  • Clear description and scope
  • Impact and immediate containment
  • Investigation summary
  • Disposition/next steps
  • Links to related CAPA/change/training

Typical pitfalls

  • Treating NCRs as deviations to avoid disposition
  • Raising CAPA for every deviation

Metrics

  • Rate of deviations by process/equipment
  • NCR rate by product/lot
  • % linked to CAPA or change control

How an eQMS helps

  • Distinct templates and required fields by record type
  • Routing and approvals by role
  • AI Assist: condenses narrative into a reviewer‑friendly summary and suggests checklists based on context

Conclusion

Use deviation for process departures, NCR for out‑of‑spec results, and connect them via CAPA/change when systemic. The clarity keeps audits calm and throughput high.

Similar Posts